Thursday, January 16, 2025

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Handling, and Intermediate Checks of Certified Reference Materials (CRM)

  

1.0 PURPOSE

This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) outlines the process for the procurement, handling, and intermediate checks of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) used in chemical testing laboratories, specifically for the quantification of residues and metals in food and related products.

2.0 SCOPE

2.1 This SOP applies to all personnel involved in the handling and use of CRMs for chemical testing in food and related product laboratories.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITY

3.1 Analyst: Responsible for procuring, handling, maintaining, and performing intermediate checks of CRMs.


3.2 Quality Assurance (QA): Responsible for maintaining the SOP ‘Master Copy’ and ensuring that it is approved through the Quality Manager.


3.3 User Departments: Ensure that a 'Control Copy' of the SOP is available with the user department.

 

4.0 DISTRIBUTION

4.1 The QA department will ensure that the approved SOP is distributed to all relevant departments.


4.2 Each department should keep the ‘Control Copy’ for reference.

 

5.0 ABBREVIATIONS

  • SOP: Standard Operating Procedure
  • CRM: Certified Reference Material
  • COA: Certificate of Analysis
  • RPD: Relative Percent Difference
  • ID: Identification
  • R: Response
  • WS: Working Standards
  • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology

 

 

 

 

6.0 PROCEDURE

6.1 Procurement of Certified Reference Materials

6.1.1 CRMs must be procured from approved manufacturers or suppliers.


6.1.2 The procurement of CRMs should meet the following requirements:

  • A current and valid Certificate of Analysis (COA) with traceability with ISO 17034.
  • An expiration date that is current.
  • NIST traceability should be ensured wherever possible during procurement.
6.2 Receipt of Certified Reference Materials

6.2.1 Upon receipt, each CRM shall be assigned a unique identification code for tracking, from the neat standard to the final dilution.
6.2.2 Documentation of the receipt should include the following details:

  • Name of the CRM
  • Unique identification code
  • Purity
  • Lot number
  • Quantity received
  • Gross weight
  • Date received
  • Expiration date


6.2.3 The receipt and traceability of each CRM must be documented and retained in the laboratory records.

6.3 Storage of Certified Reference Materials

6.3.1 CRMs should be stored at the temperature specified in the Certificate of Analysis (COA).


6.3.2 Stock standards and dilutions, including mixed standards, should be stored in refrigerators or freezers to prevent contamination or in the  specific condition if required.


6.3.3 Access to the storage areas should be controlled.
6.3.4 The following records must be maintained for storage:

  • Temperature readings of refrigerators and freezers, recorded daily.
  • Details of the standards used (e.g., standard name, volume, solvent, lot number, purity, final concentration, storage location).


6.3.5 CRMs should be used within 12 months of preparation or before expiration, whichever is earlier.

6.4 Preparation of Intermediate Dilutions

6.4.1 Intermediate dilutions, including mixed standards, should be prepared in a clean, controlled environment.
6.4.2 Each dilution should be labelled with the following information:

  • Name of CRM
  • Concentration
  • Solvent used
  • Date of preparation
  • Initials of the preparer
  • Expiration date


6.4.3 Documentation should include:

  • Amount of stock standard used
  • Solvent used
  • Volume made up
  • Date of preparation
  • Final concentration
  • Expiration date
6.5 Standard Intermediate Checking

6.5.1 Intermediate checks must be performed to ensure the integrity of dilutions and their concentrations.


6.5. Two working standards, labeled as WS1 and WS2, should be prepared separately. One standard (WS1) is made from the stock solution, and the other (WS2) is made from the intermediate dilution. Both standards should then be analyzed using the appropriate equipment to measure their respective responses (R1 for WS1 and R2 for WS2). These responses are used to check the consistency and accuracy of the standards.


6.5.3 The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) between the responses should be calculated as follows:


6.5.4 Acceptance Criteria: The RPD should not exceed 10%


6.5.5 Any discrepancies should be investigated, and corrective actions should be taken.

6.6 Documentation of Intermediate Checks

6.6.1 All intermediate checks must be documented in the logbooks to ensure traceability and compliance with the SOP.


6.6.2 The logbook must include:

  • Date and time of check
  • Identification code of CRM used
  • Responses obtained (R1 and R2)
  • RPD calculation and results
  • Any corrective actions taken, if applicable.

 

7.0 RECORDS

  • Certificate of Analysis (COA) for each CRM
  • Logbooks for intermediate checks and preparation of dilutions
  • Temperature logs for storage units (refrigerators/freezers)
  • Procurement records for each CRM

 

8.0 REVISION HISTORY

  • Version 1.0 – As per the lab policy

 

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Update: Withdrawal of BIS Standard IS 4251:1967

 

The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has officially withdrawn the standard IS 4251:1967, of "Quality tolerances for water for the processed food industry.

Key Details:

  • Standard Number: IS 4251:1967
  • Reaffirmed Year: 2020
  • Technical Committee: FAD 14
  • Status: Withdrawn

The withdrawal marks a significant step in revising and updating the standards for water quality used in the processed food industry. Laboratory professionals ensure that they refer to the latest applicable guidelines or standards as recommended by BIS or other regulatory authorities.

Implications for the Industry:

  1. Regulatory Compliance: Entities in the processed food sector must ensure compliance with updated or alternative water quality standards to meet safety and quality requirements.
  2. Review and Adoption: It is essential to remain proactive in adopting the latest regulations to maintain food safety and product quality.

For further updates or clarifications consult the BIS standards database.

 

Monday, January 13, 2025

MPPSC Food Safety Officer FSO Recruitment 2025- 120 posts

 

The Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (MPPSC) has announced an online recruitment drive for 120 vacancies for the position of Food Safety Officer (FSO) under the Department of Public Health and Medical Education. Eligible and interested candidates, both male and female, can apply online through the official MPPSC website at mppsc.mp.gov.in. The application window opens on 28th March 2025 and closes on 27th April 2025.


Application Start Date: 28-03-2025

Application Last Date: 27-04-2025

Fee Payment Last Date: 27-04-2025

Correction Window: 01 to 29 Apr 2025

 

Age as on : 01.01.2025

Minimum Age: 21 Years

Maximum Age: 40 Years

(For Age Relaxation See Notification.)

Aspiring candidates for the position of Food Safety Officer (FSO) under the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (MPPSC) must meet the following eligibility criteria for the year 2025 for 120 posts:

Educational Eligibility/Qualification criteria

Candidates must possess one of the following qualifications from a recognized university or institution:

A graduate, postgraduate, or doctorate degree in any of the following specialized areas of Food Technology:

1.      Food Engineering

2.      Food Engineering and Technology

3.      Food Processing and Preservation

4.      Food Processing Technology

5.      Food Technology and Management

6.      Food Biotechnology

7.      Food Plant Operations Management

8.      Food Process Engineering and Management

9.      Food Processing

10.  Food Safety and Quality Management

11.  Process and Food Engineering

Subjects of Study under Agricultural Science

Alternatively, candidates may qualify with a degree in one of the following disciplines related to Agricultural Science:

1.      Agriculture

2.      Agricultural Engineering

3.      Biotechnology

4.      Dairy Technology

5.      Fisheries

6.      Food Technology

7.      Food Nutrition and Dietetics

8.      Horticulture

Note:

Candidates are advised to ensure their degree is recognized by the relevant educational or professional bodies to avoid any discrepancies during the selection process.

This comprehensive eligibility criterion ensures that only individuals with a solid foundation in food and agricultural sciences contribute to safeguarding public health as Food Safety Officers.

 

Visit the link for more details:-

MADHYA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION- ADVT.


 

 

Monday, January 6, 2025

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.1.1: Review of Requests, Tenders, and Contracts

 

Clause 7.1.1 of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 emphasizes the importance of systematically reviewing customer requests, tenders, and contracts. This ensures that the laboratory can meet customer requirements effectively, while maintaining compliance with the standard’s principles of quality and competence.

Key Definition

The terms requests, tenders, and contracts refer to the following:

  1. Requests:

These are inquiries or orders received from customers for specific laboratory services

 

  1. Tenders:

Formal offers or proposals made by a laboratory in response to an inquiry from a customer. Tenders usually outline the scope, methods, costs, and timelines.

 

  1. Contracts:

Agreements between the laboratory and the customer defining the terms and conditions of the work to be performed. Contracts specify details like testing scope, timelines, methods, and fees.

This clause emphasis that the laboratories to review requests, tenders, and contracts to ensure:

  • Customer requirements are clearly defined and understood.
  • The laboratory has the capability, resources, and competence to fulfil the requirements.
  • If external providers are involved, the laboratory informs the customer and gains approval.
  • Appropriate methods and procedures are selected to meet customer expectations.

 

  

Documented Procedure

Laboratories must establish a documented procedure for reviewing all requests, tenders, and contracts. This procedure should ensure consistency in how requirements are evaluated, recorded, and communicated.

 

  1. Requirement Definition (7.1.1a)

The laboratory must ensure that customer requirements are adequately defined, documented, and understood. This includes:

      • Scope of testing or analysis
      • Applicable standards or methods
      • Turnaround times and reporting formats

 

  1. Capability Assessment (7.1.1b)

The laboratory must evaluate its ability to fulfil the requirements. This includes:

      • Availability of trained personnel
      • Suitability and availability of equipment
      • Time and resources needed to meet deadlines

 

  1. Use of External Providers (7.1.1c)

If external providers (e.g., subcontractors) are involved, the laboratory must:

      • Apply the requirements of Clause 6.6
      • Inform the customer about the involvement of external providers
      • Obtain the customer’s approval before proceeding
      •  

External providers may be engaged in cases where:

      • The laboratory lacks the resources or competence to perform certain activities
      • The laboratory has the competence but cannot perform the work due to unforeseen circumstances

 

  

  1. Selection of Methods (7.1.1d)

 

Appropriate methods and procedures must be selected to ensure the results meet customer requirements. These methods should:

      • Be validated or verified
      • Align with applicable standards or regulatory guidelines

 

5.     Simplified Reviews 

For internal or routine customers, reviews of requests, tenders, and contracts can be simplified. For example, predefined agreements or established workflows may be used for repeat customers.

  

Implementation in Food Testing Laboratories

Food testing laboratories play a crucial role in ensuring the safety, quality of food products. Clause 7.1’s requirements are particularly relevant to customer needs, regulatory requirements.

 Clause 7.1.1 can be applied :

1.     Requirement Definition

A food manufacturer approaches a laboratory to test pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. The lab:

§  Discusses the scope of testing, identifying specific pesticides and regulatory limits (e.g., FSSAI).

§  Confirms the required turnaround time and parameter to be report.

§  Documents these requirements clearly in the contract and record it.

 

  1. Capability Assessment

The lab reviews its internal resources to ensure:

      • Availability of trained analysts.
      • Properly calibrated equipment, such as GC-MS or LC-MS/MS, for pesticide residue analysis.
      • Availability of Certified Reference Material (CRM)
      • Sufficient time and material resources to meet the deadline.

 

3.     Use of External Providers

If a specific parameter, need to be to be subcontracted these parameter shall be in the accredited scope of the lab

§  Informs the customer about the subcontracting arrangement.

§   Ensures that the subcontractor complies with ISO/IEC 17025 and other applicable standards.

4.     Selection of Methods:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  The lab selects AOAC or validated methods for pesticide analysis. For example:

§  Multi-residue pesticide analysis using GC-MS.

§  Ensures the method meets detection limits and regulatory requirements.

 

  1. Simplified Reviews

For routine customers, such as a customer sending regular batches of spices for aflatoxin testing, the lab:

      • Uses a predefined service agreement.
      • Skips detailed reviews for each batch, relying on established workflows.

 

Practical Steps for Compliance

  1. Develop a Comprehensive Review Procedure

Create a documented procedure outlining the steps for reviewing requests, tenders, and contracts. Include templates or checklists for consistency.

  1. Train Staff

Ensure staff understand the review process and their responsibilities. Training should cover:

      • Identifying and defining customer requirements
      • Assessing laboratory capabilities
      • Communicating with customers and external provider
      •  
  1. Maintain Records

Keep detailed records of:

      • Initial customer communications
      • Defined requirements and agreed terms
      • Capability assessments and subcontracting approvals
      • Methods selected and justifications

 

  1. Monitor and Review

Periodically review the effectiveness of the procedure. Identify and address any gaps or inefficiencies.

 

 

Importance of Clause 7.1.1

  1. Customer Satisfaction

Clear reviews ensure that the lab understands and meets customer needs, building trust and confidence.

  1. Operational Efficiency

Assessing capabilities beforehand helps the lab avoid overcommitting or delays.

  1. Risk Mitigation

Ensures the lab only accepts work within its scope and capacity, reducing the risk of non-compliance or errors.

  1. Transparency

Keeps customers informed about subcontracting arrangements and method selection, enhancing accountability.

  1. Regulatory Compliance

Aligns laboratory operations with regulatory requirements and standards, ensuring reliable and defensible results.







 

Friday, December 27, 2024

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Good Documentation Practices (GDP) in a Food Testing Laboratory


1.0 Objective

To establish standardized procedures for documenting, maintaining, and reviewing records in the food testing laboratory to ensure data integrity, traceability, and compliance with regulatory requirements specific to food safety and testing.

 

2.0 Scope

This SOP applies to all laboratory personnel involved in data recording, document preparation, maintenance, and review in compliance with Good laboratory Practices (GLP), ISO 17025, and FSSAI mannula for food testing.

 

3.0 Responsibility

3.1 Laboratory Personnel:

·         Ensure compliance with Good Documentation Practices while recording and handling food testing data.

3.2 Department Heads:

·         Oversee adherence to GDP guidelines and perform periodic audits of food testing records.

3.3 Quality Assurance  (QA):

·         Maintain master copies of documents and review controlled document compliance for food testing processes.

 

4.0 Definitions and Abbreviations

4.1 Definitions:

·         Good Documentation Practices (GDP): Guidelines for creating and maintaining accurate, clear, and complete records specific to food testing procedures.

4.2 Abbreviations:

·         SOP: Standard Operating Procedure.

·         GDP: Good Documentation Practices.

·         QA: Quality Assurance.

·         FSSAI: Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.

 

5.0 Procedure

5.1 General Guidelines

1.      Use of Ink:

Always use indelible blue or black ink for manual entries. Entries must be legible, clear, and without ambiguity.

2.      Date Format:

Record dates as DD/MM/YYYY

3.      Error Correction:

Do not overwrite or erase errors. Draw a single line through the incorrect entry, write the correct information nearby, and initial with the date of correction.

4.      Completeness:

All fields in documents must be filled. If not applicable, write "N/A" or "Not Applicable."

5.      Page numbaer:

Number pages as “Page X of Y” to ensure completeness.

6.      Avoid Blank Spaces:

Cross out any unused space with a diagonal line and note "Cancelled" or "Not Applicable" with initials and date.

 

5.2 Documentation Standards

1.      Headers and Footers:

Include document title, SOP number, version, and effective date on each page.

2.      Signatures and Initials:

Every document must have signatures, initials, and dates of preparation, review, and approval.

3.      Instrument Records:

Record the name, identification number, and calibration status of instruments used in food testing or analysis.

4.      Analytical Data:

Maintain detailed records of reference standards, lot numbers, and method descriptions for food samples.

5.      Sample Identification:

Each food sample must have a unique identification number to ensure traceability.

 

5.3 Handling and Storage

1.      Control Copies:

Use "Controlled Copy" stamps for distributed documents and maintain a log of issued copies.

2.      Master Copies:

Store original documents securely in the Quality Assurance archive.

3.      Document Retention:

Retain documents for the duration specified by regulatory requirements (e.g., FSSAI guidelines).

4.      Access Control:

Restrict access to sensitive documents to authorized personnel only.

 

5.4 Training

1.      Awareness Training:

Conduct regular training for all personnel on GDP principles specific to food testing.

2.      Documentation Updates:

Train employees on changes to documentation formats or requirements related to food safety standards.

 

6.0 Precautions

1.      Do not use correction fluid, tape, or pencil entries in records.

2.      Ensure records are clean, safe, and stored to prevent damage or loss.

3.      Verify data accuracy during entry to minimize errors.

4.      Maintain confidentiality of food testing records.

 

7.0 References

1.      ISO 17025: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

2.      FSSAI Guidelines for Food Testing Laboratories.

 

8.0 Annexures

1.      Annexure 1: Format for Document Correction Log.

2.      Annexure 2: Training Record Template.

3.      Annexure 3: Document Issuance and Retrieval Log.

4.      Annexure 4: Sample Identification Log Template.

 

9.0 Revision History

Version

 Effective Date

 Description of Changes

 Prepared By

 Approved By

1.0

DD/MM/YYYY

Initial Release

QA Officer

Lab Director

 

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Handling, and Intermediate Checks of Certified Reference Materials (CRM)

    1.0 PURPOSE This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) outlines the process for the procurement, handling, and intermediate checks of C...